Author summary
97% 20 analyzed articles/videos 6,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arabella Bennett results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 3,723 hits . Analysis detected 39,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,289 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,347 of 6,499 authors). This Arabella Bennett is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Arabella Bennett
Author details
Total words: 25,289
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score20 analyzed articles25.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.9% 12.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst