Keyword summary
83%3 analyzed articles/videos189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hyperscalers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 3,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,243 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,526 of 35,080 keywords). This Hyperscalers is worse (more manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Hyperscalers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
96%Hyperscalers (selected)11%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,243
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510095.7% percentile
11.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 37.1%37.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 33.7%33.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 32.5%32.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.6%18.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 33.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 32.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos