Keyword summary
69% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goldman Sachs results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 2,592 hits . Analysis detected 29,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,106 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,814 of 35,861 keywords). This Goldman Sachs is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Goldman Sachs
Keyword details
Total words: 23,106
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst