Author summary
32% 19 analyzed articles/videos 6,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marcus Mendes results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 3,954 hits . Analysis detected 20,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,830 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,790 of 6,263 authors). This Marcus Mendes is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Marcus Mendes
Author details
Total words: 32,830
Article count: 19
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score19 analyzed articles32.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst