9to5Mac58%

Apple updates macOS 28 guidance with direct encrypted HFS+ to APFS conversion 14%

By Marcus Mendes29%

7/22/2026, 3:40:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 335 faulty-reasoning hits from 368 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,918 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the article peer group.

Users who rely on encrypted HFS+ drives will no longer need to decrypt them before converting them to APFS for macOS 28 compatibility. 
Here’s what that means. 
Apple revises macOS 28 migration guidance for encrypted HFS+ drives 
A few weeks ago, Apple published a support document explaining that starting with macOS 28, “the Mac OS Extended file system format will be supported only for volumes (disks and other storage devices) that aren’t encrypted.” 
This basically meant that users who currently rely on encrypted HFS+ external drives or other encrypted legacy Mac-formatted volumes would need to “either decrypt or reformat any encrypted Mac OS Extended volumes,” as Apple explained. 
Previously, the support page provided step-by-step instructions for either decrypting the volume or erasing and reformatting it using APFS. 
Apple has now revised the page to add a third option, allowing users to convert an encrypted HFS+ volume directly to encrypted APFS without decrypting it first. 
The company now provides the following instructions for the new process: 
Convert the volume to encrypted APFS 
1. 
Open Disk Utility, which is in the Utilities folder of your Applications folder. 
Or use Spotlight to find and open it. 
2. 
From the View menu in the menu bar, choose Show Only Volumes. 
3. 
In the sidebar of Disk Utility, select the name of the volume. 
4. 
From the Edit menu in the menu bar, choose Convert to APFS, then click Convert to confirm. 
5. 
Quit Disk Utility when done. 
Apple notes, however, that “this solution doesn’t apply to encrypted Time Machine backup disks.” 
The company has also removed its previous instructions for decrypting the volume first, converting it to APFS without erasing it, and then optionally re-encrypting it. 
To check out the updated support page, follow this link. 
Does this new option make it easier for you to prepare your drives for macOS 28? 
Let us know in the comments. 
Worth checking out on Amazon 
Geoffrey Cain  ‘Steve Jobs in Exile’ 
David Pogue  ’Apple: The First 50 Years’ 
MacBook Neo 
Logitech MX Master 4 
AirPods Pro 3 
AirTag (2nd Generation)  4 Pack 
Apple Watch Series 11 
Wireless CarPlay adapter 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 2.3%9to5Mac: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 1.2%9to5Mac: 2.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 2.6%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.3%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.8%9to5Mac: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Marcus Mendes: 5.2%9to5Mac: 5.3%Framing Effect12.8%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.4%9to5Mac: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Marcus Mendes: 1.7%9to5Mac: 3.4%Optimism Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 1.1%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Marcus Mendes: 3.3%9to5Mac: 4.6%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 3.7%9to5Mac: 3.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Marcus Mendes: 1.8%9to5Mac: 1.8%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%Marcus Mendes: 3.0%9to5Mac: 3.6%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 9.5%Marcus Mendes: 1.0%9to5Mac: 1.4%False Dilemma9.5%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 2.2%9to5Mac: 4.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 1.6%9to5Mac: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 1.8%9to5Mac: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 2.2%9to5Mac: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.8%Marcus Mendes: 1.7%9to5Mac: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.8%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.8%Marcus Mendes: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.2%Special Pleading6.8%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.3%Marcus Mendes: 2.6%9to5Mac: 2.4%Unattributed Quote13.3%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 4.0%9to5Mac: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.3%Marcus Mendes: 0.5%9to5Mac: 2.1%Indoctrination4.3%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marcus Mendes: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Marcus Mendes: 11.5%9to5Mac: 15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.3%

368 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker23%attributed speech283writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 36 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Apple

100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words100% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Unattributed Quote+57.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Apple: 57.6%57.6%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%Apple: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Apple: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.