Topic summary
71% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment Strategies results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,727 hits . Analysis detected 16,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,259 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,510 of 16,562 topics). This Investment Strategies is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Investment Strategies
Topic details
Total words: 12,259
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst