Topic summary
79% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Stocks results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,122 hits . Analysis detected 10,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,171 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,615 of 16,259 topics). This Technology Stocks is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Technology Stocks
Topic details
Total words: 7,171
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst