ZeroHedge⁠70%

Markets 'Turmoil' Amid Micron Mania, Hormuz Hiccups, & Peaky PCE ⁠92%

By Tyler Durden⁠61%

6/25/2026, 8:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 83.9% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 746 faulty-reasoning hits from 155 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,692 of 21,171 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the article peer group.

Markets 'Turmoil' Amid Micron Mania, Hormuz Hiccups, & Peaky PCE 
Tl;dr: Micron jumped the shark with epic earnings (but, watch the spenders), tolls on Hormuz crossings are back on the table raising deal doubts (oil jumped), and a weaker than expected headline PCE (short-end yields down) prompted some wild swings across asset-classes today with big-tech and bitcoin bearing the brunt of the volatility. 
A dip in the dollar supported gold back above $4000. 
A metric-fuckton of macro this morning was overall 'positive' with income and spending rising (real spending up but savings rate slowed), 3rd look at Q1 GDP better than expected (but consumption slowed as AI spend ripped), initial jobless claims dropped (but cont claims picked up), durable goods orders were weak (but better than expected and Ex-Trans were up notably), KC Fed Manufacturing up at 4 year highs. 
Oil 
Stocks 
Rates 
Everything Else 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 77.4%Tyler Durden: 7.5%ZeroHedge: 7.6%Confirmation Bias77.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 34.2%Tyler Durden: 4.5%ZeroHedge: 4.5%Availability Heuristic34.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.9%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 83.9%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect83.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.1%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 43.2%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.7%Pessimism Bias43.2%This article: 40.6%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias40.6%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.2%ZeroHedge: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 34.2%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias34.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.4%ZeroHedge: 6.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.6%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 40.6%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)40.6%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 43.2%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)43.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 83.9%Tyler Durden: 10.6%ZeroHedge: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice83.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

155 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.