Keyword summary
50% 39 analyzed articles/videos 17,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hormuz results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 10,265 hits . Analysis detected 90,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 108,380 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (30,365 of 34,040 keywords). This Hormuz is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Hormuz
Keyword details
Total words: 108,380
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score38 analyzed articles108.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst