Sen. Slotkin: Trump Is Desperate to Escape His Iran War | Command Post ⁠55%

By Mark Hertling⁠41% Benjamin Parker⁠90%

7/21/2026, 8:01:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 159 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (9,942 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the article peer group.

Lt. 
Gen. 
Mark Hertling (Ret.) and Ben Parker are joined by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) for her take on the state of the Iran war, U.S. military strategy, and the health of American democracy heading into the midterms. 
Slotkin, a former CIA analyst with three tours in Iraq, pushes back on Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's testimony that the U.S. has neutralized Iran's naval threat in the Strait of Hormuz, arguing Iran retains "veto power" over the critical waterway through drones, mines, and fast boats. 
Plus, Sen. 
Slotkin explains how her "Protect Our Polls Act" is designed to block the military from being deployed to polling sites during the midterms without congressional approval. 
As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. 
Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members. 
Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 29.6%Mark Hertling: 5.7%The Bulwark: 5.8%Confirmation Bias29.6%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.1%The Bulwark: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.9%The Bulwark: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.8%The Bulwark: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 2.1%The Bulwark: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Mark Hertling: 7.1%The Bulwark: 6.8%Framing Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.8%The Bulwark: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.1%The Bulwark: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.2%The Bulwark: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 2.8%The Bulwark: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Mark Hertling: 7.7%The Bulwark: 11.2%Negativity Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.4%The Bulwark: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.5%The Bulwark: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.6%The Bulwark: 3.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.5%The Bulwark: 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 2.1%The Bulwark: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.2%The Bulwark: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.1%The Bulwark: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.8%The Bulwark: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Mark Hertling: 1.5%The Bulwark: 3.3%Ad Hominem7.5%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.3%The Bulwark: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.6%Mark Hertling: 2.0%The Bulwark: 3.4%Appeal to Authority29.6%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.8%The Bulwark: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.3%The Bulwark: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.4%The Bulwark: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 6.3%The Bulwark: 8.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.1%The Bulwark: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 3.8%The Bulwark: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.9%The Bulwark: 1.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.7%The Bulwark: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.3%The Bulwark: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.3%The Bulwark: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 5.3%The Bulwark: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 2.2%The Bulwark: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.1%The Bulwark: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.1%The Bulwark: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 2.7%The Bulwark: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 1.4%The Bulwark: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 9.0%The Bulwark: 15.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 2.6%The Bulwark: 2.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 7.5%Mark Hertling: 1.3%The Bulwark: 5.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Mark Hertling: 0.3%The Bulwark: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Mark Hertling: 4.3%The Bulwark: 4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.7%

159 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker46%attributed speech86writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageElissa Slotkin • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageElissa Slotkin • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Elissa Slotkin

64%flagged-word coverage
73 attributed words100% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -29.1 ptsWriter: 29.1%Elissa Slotkin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-14.0 ptsWriter: 14.0%Elissa Slotkin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.