Author summary
90%2 analyzed articles/videos297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Parker results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,665 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (829 of 6,169 authors). This Benjamin Parker is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Benjamin Parker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%Benjamin Parker (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,665
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.5%19.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 8.0%8.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 25.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos