Author summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellie Geranmayeh results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 499 hits . Analysis detected 3,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,705 of 6,196 authors). This Ellie Geranmayeh is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Ellie Geranmayeh
Author details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst