Topic summary
73% 38 analyzed articles/videos 17,830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cryptocurrency results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 12,337 hits . Analysis detected 97,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,909 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,893 of 15,753 topics). This Cryptocurrency is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Cryptocurrency
Topic details
Total words: 87,909
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score38 analyzed articles87.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst