Author summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Broomfield results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,913 hits . Analysis detected 10,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,788 of 6,244 authors). This Matt Broomfield is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Matt Broomfield
Author details
Total words: 6,968
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.8% 24.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.4% 27.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 27.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst