Author summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capital results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,969 hits . Analysis detected 13,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,832 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,506 of 6,316 authors). This Capital is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Capital
Author details
Total words: 11,832
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.6% 16.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst