Topic summary
⁠89%5 analyzed articles/videos3,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earnings results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 2,060 hits. Analysis detected 12,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,026 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,196 of 16,562 topics). This Earnings is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Earnings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,026
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos