Keyword summary
97% 2 analyzed articles/videos 910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Traders results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 4,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,807 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (5,684 of 35,316 keywords). This Traders is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Traders
Keyword details
Total words: 2,807
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst