Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OAN Staff (Katherine Mosack) results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.9% saturation with 1,092 hits . Analysis detected 6,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,145 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 95% (350 of 6,360 authors). This OAN Staff (Katherine Mosack) is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. OAN Staff (Katherine Mosack)
Author details
Total words: 2,145
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.5% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 40.2% 40.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 50.9% 50.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 25.4% 25.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.8% 21.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 18.1% 18.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.2% 19.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 25.4% 25.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 50.9%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 40.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 25.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 10.4%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst