Author summary
â 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Chapman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 502 hits . Analysis detected 3,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,466 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of â 79% (1,394 of 6,628 authors). This Michelle Chapman is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Michelle Chapman
Author details
Total words: 2,466
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.4% 20.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst