Author summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katelyn Newberg results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,416 of 6,353 authors). This Katelyn Newberg is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Katelyn Newberg
Author details
Total words: 2,916
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst