Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nava Silton results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,509 of 28,364 speakers). This Nava Silton is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Nava Silton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos