Breitbart82%

LA Times Writer Rebukes Dodgers for Visiting White House: 'Are the Dodgers Tone Deaf?' 48%

By Paul Bois56% #author72%

7/10/2026, 5:42:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 62.8% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 390 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,198 of 21,181 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the article peer group.

Bill Plaschke, writer for the Los Angeles Times , rebuked the Dodgers for committing to their upcoming visit to the White House to celebrate their 2025 World Series victory. 
Plaschke excoriated the Dodgers, who won the World Series back-to-back and are poised for a three-peat, in a lengthy op-ed published on Thursday. 
According to Plaschke, Trump has been seeking to tear the city of Los Angeles apart, focusing exclusively on the president’s immigration enforcement policy. 
Some, including Dodgers officials, argued this was a visit about tradition, not politics. 
Teams have been visiting the White House since President Andrew Johnson hosted two amateur baseball clubs in 1865. 
The Dodgers said they were abiding by this once-revered sports custom. 
They said they were showing respect for this country’s highest office, not necessarily the man inhabiting it. 
Understood. 
But what happened two months after that first visit altered even that flimsy bit of logic, as the man inhabiting the office rained terror on Los Angeles with the midsummer ICE raids that changed the lives of thousands. 
Many impacted were the Dodgers fans who filled the stadium every night for the team with arguably the largest immigrant fan base in sports. 
Some even were wearing Dodgers caps and jerseys when they were swept up and hauled away. 
After criticizing the Dodgers for reluctantly “fulfilling a $1.1-million donation to community organizations to support families impacted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement,” he then pointed to longtime fan Jose Madera, director of the Pasadena Community Job Center, who quit attending games. 
“It’s very disappointing to hear that our team is going to shake the hand of a person who has sent so much hate and terror into our community,” said Madera. 
“Thousands of families in our city live in fear  we can’t stand for what’s going on.” 
Madera called upon the Dodgers to remember who they are 
“The Dodgers bring so much joy to our community, but a large part of their fan base is the immigrant community, and they need to stand with us,” he said. 
“It’s very disappointing that they’re not, and we need to hold them accountable.” 
While some online agreed with Plaschke’s take, others appreciated the Dodgers for attempting to be a symbol of unity during divisive times. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.5%Paul Bois: 3.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Paul Bois: 2.1%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 6.2%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic6.2%This article: 9.7%Paul Bois: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Paul Bois: 9.1%Breitbart: 11.8%Framing Effect15.1%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.4%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.4%Status Quo Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.4%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Paul Bois: 0.1%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias16.9%This article: 62.8%Paul Bois: 7.9%Breitbart: 9.8%Negativity Bias62.8%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error10.5%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Paul Bois: 2.2%Breitbart: 4.8%In-Group Bias13.6%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.4%Breitbart: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Paul Bois: 1.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 3.1%Breitbart: 2.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 3.1%Breitbart: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 16.9%Paul Bois: 0.9%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma16.9%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%Paul Bois: 4.1%Breitbart: 8.0%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.1%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 4.2%Breitbart: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 51.0%Paul Bois: 6.4%Breitbart: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion51.0%This article: 2.6%Paul Bois: 2.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 9.7%Paul Bois: 2.9%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.5%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.8%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.8%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Paul Bois: 6.2%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.4%Paul Bois: 1.1%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.4%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.5%Paul Bois: 2.3%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote10.5%This article: 7.7%Paul Bois: 2.6%Breitbart: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection7.7%This article: 17.4%Paul Bois: 6.3%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice17.4%This article: 15.4%Paul Bois: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.0%Indoctrination15.4%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.4%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.4%Breitbart: 7.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

390 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers39%attributed speech239writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBill Plaschke • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDodgers • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDodgers • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageJose Madera • 30 words • 100.0% coverageJose Madera • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJose Madera • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJose Madera • 30 words • 100.0% coverageJose Madera • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill Plaschke

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words15% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.5 ptsWriter: 28.5%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-17.2 ptsWriter: 17.2%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.