Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly McGreal results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 904 hits. Analysis detected 8,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,036 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,545 of 6,204 authors). This Kelly McGreal is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Kelly McGreal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
43%Kelly McGreal (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,036
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate