Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 12,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Brennan results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 4,594 hits . Analysis detected 31,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,739 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,167 of 6,244 authors). This Hannah Brennan is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Hannah Brennan
Author details
Total words: 63,739
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles63.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst