Fox News89%

GOP firebrand lashes out at reporter over Massie allegation: ‘F--- you, first of all!’ 34%

By Hannah Brennan0%

6/7/2026, 1:00:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 874 faulty-reasoning hits from 503 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,537 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., cursed out a Fox News Digital reporter after he began asking about allegations of a sexual relationship between her and Rep. 
Thomas Massie, R-Ky., that were recently raised by a woman identifying herself as Massie's ex-girlfriend. 
"F    you, first of all!’ 
Boebert said to a Fox News Digital reporter when bringing up claims from Massie’s alleged ex-girlfriend. 
"If you're gonna bring me into this, like, the sexist stuff is like out of control," she continued. 
"So there's your clickbait that you were looking for." 
FIVE TIMES NANCY PELOSI LOST HER COOL WITH THE MEDIA 
Boebert then declined to discuss the allegations further. 
The exchange came after Boebert had been discussing President Donald Trump's efforts to unseat Republican incumbents and Massie's political future. 
The former congressional staffer Cynthia West, who previously worked for Rep. 
Victoria Spartz, R-Ind., accused Massie of bragging to her about an alleged sexual encounter with Boebert within weeks of his wife's death. 
West also accused Massie of offering her $5,000 to drop a wrongful termination lawsuit she was pursuing against Spartz, an ally of Massie. 
The allegations surfaced just a week before Massie lost his House seat in the May 19 Republican primary. 
"I don't want to talk about anybody's exes and their crazy s–   that they do," Boebert said to the reporter. 
Before the exchange turned contentious, Boebert was answering questions about whether Trump's strategy of backing primary challengers against Republican incumbents is backfiring on the GOP agenda. 
MTG SAYS GOP'S FUTURE 'DESTROYED' AFTER TRUMP-BACKED PRIMARY CHALLENGER DEFEATS THOMAS MASSIE IN PRIMARY 
"I think most of the folks that have lost their primaries, they were backfiring on the GOP agenda  Cassidy, Cornyn," Boebert replied. 
"I mean, obviously Thomas Massie is the only one that I'm a little sad about," she said.  
Boebert was also asked about Massie’s recent announcement that he is filing for re-election in 2028. 
Many are speculating that Massie could make a 2028 presidential run as he said he is unsure which position he will be seeking re-election for. 
"I haven’t made a final decision about which office to seek, if I run," he wrote in a post on X announcing his re-election filing with the Federal Election Commission.   
TRUMP CALLS OUT REP THOMAS MASSIE: 'KENTUCKY, GET THIS LOSER OUT OF POLITICS' TUESDAY 
Boebert shared that she was unsure of Massie’s next move, before she reprimanded the reporter for shifting the conversation to allegations raised by West. 
"He filed for something," she said. 
"He didn't specify what and I don't know if he's going to move forward with that or not. 
I don’t know." 
"Hopefully he leaves here and makes some money," Boebert added. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Moments later, the reporter began asking about the allegations from Massie’s alleged ex-girlfriend, prompting Boebert's expletive-laced response. 
Boebert declined to discuss the allegations further and walked away from the interview. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Hannah Brennan: 1.3%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Hannah Brennan: 1.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic12.3%This article: 4.6%Hannah Brennan: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.3%Hannah Brennan: 5.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect22.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Hannah Brennan: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 31.0%Hannah Brennan: 7.2%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias31.0%This article: 6.2%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.8%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Hannah Brennan: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Hannah Brennan: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 2.6%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.2%Hannah Brennan: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.0%Hannah Brennan: 3.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 6.8%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring6.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.6%Hannah Brennan: 3.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 20.3%Hannah Brennan: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)20.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.6%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof4.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal11.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%Hannah Brennan: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.4%Hannah Brennan: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

503 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers45%attributed speech278writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 8 words • 100.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCynthia West • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCynthia West • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Massie • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Boebert • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Cynthia West

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words20% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Cynthia West: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Cynthia West: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.