Fox News88%

Top Dem lawmakers duck questions when pressed on Platner's Reddit scandal 66%

By Hannah Brennan0%

5/21/2026, 10:00:23 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 638 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,139 of 20,516 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the article peer group.

Top Democratic leaders refused to answer whether Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner’s newly uncovered vulgar posts have become a liability for Democrats ahead of the midterm elections. 
"I haven’t seen no posts," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., told Fox News Digital when asked whether Platner had become a liability to the Democratic Party. 
Newly surfaced Reddit posts tied to Platner  from an archive of roughly 2,000 salacious takes  include graphic sexual comments about masturbating in portable toilets and praising explicit graffiti depicting genitalia. 
UNEARTHED POSTS SHOW DEM SENATE HOPEFUL PRAISING VULGAR GRAFFITI, MAKING CRUDE PORTA-POTTY ADMISSION 
In another post, he mocked a Purple Heart U.S. soldier that was nearly killed in combat, posting "dumb motherf----- didn't deserve to live." 
"I still have to jerk off every time I sit in a portas----er… that blue water smell conditioned me," was among one of the many crude social media posts discovered from Platner’s past. 
Progressive Sen. 
Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., declined to comment on whether she would rescind her backing of Platner after publicly endorsing him in the Maine Democratic primary for Senate against Gov. 
Janet Mills, who pulled out of the race last month after falling behind in the polls. 
Warren’s endorsement came after Platner had already been scrutinized for some of his other controversial Reddit posts  including comments praising Hamas’ tactics, telling rape victims to take accountability and asking why Black people don’t tip. 
This was also after Platner’s chest tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol circulated the internet, as well as his participation on the subreddit "r/SocialistRA," where he described himself as a communist. 
WARREN CONFRONTED ON CALLING CONTROVERSIAL SENATE CANDIDATE GRAHAM PLATNER HER 'KIND OF MAN' 
"Holy f----, how about people just take some responsibility for themselves and not get so f---- up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to?" 
Platner posted to a 2013 Reddit thread. 
The posts came from a deleted Reddit account with the username "P-Hustle," which Platner has claimed ownership of. 
All the deleted posts can be found in the Maine Monitor’s Database, a complete archive of all 2,014 posts from his now-deleted account. 
Warren defended both Platner and her endorsement in an interview with CNBC last month after a slew of inappropriate posts resurfaced. 
She referenced his apology and praised his outreach with voters so "they can evaluate not who Graham Platner was, but who Graham Platner is today." 
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., also declined to answer repeated questions about Platner’s posts. 
Schumer endorsed Mills, before she ended her campaign, over Platner in the face-off with longtime Republican Sen. 
Susan Collins. 
Platner told Fox News Digital last week that he wouldn’t support Schumer as Senate Democratic leader going forward, even after describing their encounter as a "perfectly cordial conversation." 
SCHUMER’S ‘NUMBER ONE TARGET’ SAYS VOTERS WILL SEE HER DEMOCRAT SENATE CHALLENGER AS TOO EXTREME 
Platner is widely viewed as the presumptive Democratic nominee to unseat Collins in November. 
Democrats have so far shown little sign of distancing themselves from Platner despite the continued emergence of past obscenities. 
A super PAC backing Collins’ reelection campaign has spent $4 million on attack ads against Platner. 
Pine Tree Results released a new ad targeting Platner this week that directs viewers to a new website highlighting his controversial internet comments. 
Fox News Digital reached out to the Platner campaign for comment regarding the new posts brought to light. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Platner has previously defended himself from criticism of these posts by saying he was joking. 
"You should read the comments in context. 
It's very clear I'm joking," he previously told Fox News Digital. 
"It's called s---posting. 
It's when you argue with people on the internet and try to bother them." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Hannah Brennan: 1.3%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Hannah Brennan: 1.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic15.8%This article: 6.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Hannah Brennan: 1.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 12.4%Hannah Brennan: 5.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.4%Hannah Brennan: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 2.7%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.7%This article: 3.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 5.5%Hannah Brennan: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 45.6%Hannah Brennan: 7.2%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias45.6%This article: 8.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias8.9%This article: 4.2%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Hannah Brennan: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 2.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.4%Hannah Brennan: 2.6%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.2%Hannah Brennan: 3.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization9.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.2%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 2.4%Hannah Brennan: 3.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion2.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.8%Hannah Brennan: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 4.4%Hannah Brennan: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque4.4%This article: 3.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.2%Hannah Brennan: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal10.2%This article: 3.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman3.9%This article: 6.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 8.6%Hannah Brennan: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection8.6%This article: 36.5%Hannah Brennan: 1.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice36.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Brennan: 0.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Hannah Brennan: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

638 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers32%attributed speech431writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageElizabeth Warren • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMaine Monitor’s Database • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageElizabeth Warren • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coveragePine Tree Results • 23 words • 100.0% coverageFox News Digital • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hakeem Jeffries

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words13% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hakeem Jeffries: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+93.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Hakeem Jeffries: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-54.1 ptsWriter: 54.1%Hakeem Jeffries: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Hakeem Jeffries: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.