Keyword summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos3,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrats Senate results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 3,512 hits. Analysis detected 23,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,180 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,792 of 34,420 keywords). This Democrats Senate is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Democrats Senate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
46%Democrats Senate (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate