Keyword summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrats Senate results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 3,512 hits . Analysis detected 23,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,180 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,792 of 34,420 keywords). This Democrats Senate is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Democrats Senate
Keyword details
Total words: 17,180
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst