Fox News89%

Four Senate Republicans again unite with Dems to block Trump's SAVE America Act 84%

By Alex Miller32%

6/4/2026, 11:03:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 450 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.9% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,499 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the article peer group.

Four Senate Republicans broke ranks to kill another effort to pass President Donald Trump's marquee voter ID and election integrity legislation as the GOP marches to fund immigration enforcement. 
Just like last time, Sens. 
Susan Collins, R-Maine, Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Thom Tills, R-N.C., joined all Democrats to thwart the move. 
It’s the second attempt by Republicans to attach the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to their budget reconciliation package, and the second time that they’ve failed to get the legislation across the line months after launching a quasi-floor takeover to debate the bill. 
DOZEN GOP REBELS FAIL TO PERMANENTLY KILL TRUMP'S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND 
Trying to attach the bill to the nearly $70 billion budget reconciliation package geared toward funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol meant that the amendment from Sen. 
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., needed at least 60 votes to pass. 
That threshold again proved too high a bar on Thursday night. 
And it’s a result that further solidified the political reality in the upper chamber that the SAVE America Act has little chance of passing, given the unanimous Democratic resistance and lack of total buy-in among the Senate GOP, even if Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., launched the long sought after talking filibuster. 
REPUBLICANS FAIL TO ATTACH SAVE AMERICA ACT TO PARTY-LINE FUNDING PACKAGE 
Still, Graham challenged Democrats to bat down the amendment, accusing them of being "probably into cheating" in elections for not supporting voter ID. 
"There's no other reason to say you don't have to have an ID. 
It just makes cheating easier," Graham said. 
"Who wants a noncitizen voting in our election if you're against that, that makes me wonder." 
"And biological males playing girls sports [is] not good for anybody, and a minor should not be allowed to transition their sex," he continued. 
"That's the biggest change you can make in your entire life. 
You shouldn't be allowed to do that as a minor. 
This is what we say. 
What do you say?" 
DEMS BLOCK GOP AMENDMENT TYING VOTER ID BILL TO TRANSGENDER SPORTS BAN 
But Sen. 
Alex Padilla, D-Calif., noted "that just over a month ago, a similar proposal was defeated on a bipartisan basis." 
"Current safeguards are working," Padilla said. 
"And yes, it is already unlawful for non-citizens to vote in the United States. 
What this amendment does is mirrors earlier attempts to push through the president's priorities, to try to take over elections, to ban vote by mail." 
"And while we're at it, while they're at it, attacking trans folks during pride month, that's pretty damn offensive," he continued. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Alex miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 6.4%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias6.4%This article: 2.4%Alex miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.8%Alex miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 1.2%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Alex miller: 7.5%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.6%Alex miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 10.0%Alex miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Alex miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias14.2%This article: 45.1%Alex miller: 7.3%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias45.1%This article: 6.7%Alex miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias6.7%This article: 6.4%Alex miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.4%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Alex miller: 1.2%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 17.1%Alex miller: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias17.1%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Alex miller: 2.8%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem5.1%This article: 5.6%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man5.6%This article: 14.2%Alex miller: 2.5%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority14.2%This article: 2.9%Alex miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 22.0%Alex miller: 4.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization22.0%This article: 2.7%Alex miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring2.7%This article: 6.4%Alex miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon6.4%This article: 14.0%Alex miller: 4.8%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion14.0%This article: 12.0%Alex miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question12.0%This article: 5.8%Alex miller: 2.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 5.3%Alex miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature5.3%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.6%Alex miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.6%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 3.6%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity3.6%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.6%Alex miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection7.6%This article: 44.0%Alex miller: 4.1%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice44.0%This article: 9.8%Alex miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination9.8%This article: 5.6%Alex miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.6%This article: 5.3%Alex miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 5.1%Alex miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.1%

450 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers44%attributed speech252writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 23 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 13 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 24 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 10 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 25 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 21 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lindsey Graham

100%flagged-word coverage
113 attributed words57% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Biased Writer Voice-78.6 ptsWriter: 78.6%Lindsey Graham: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning +21.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lindsey Graham: 21.2%21.2%Indoctrination+20.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lindsey Graham: 20.4%20.4%Attempt to Sell a Product +20.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lindsey Graham: 20.4%20.4%Quote-first Misdirection+16.0 ptsWriter: 4.4%Lindsey Graham: 20.4%20.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.