Topic summary
60% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,017 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Reconciliation results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 2,966 hits . Analysis detected 21,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,250 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (10,780 of 15,327 topics). This Budget Reconciliation is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Budget Reconciliation
Topic details
Total words: 20,250
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst