Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily Brooks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 326 hits . Analysis detected 1,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,850 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,170 authors). This Emily Brooks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emily Brooks
Author details
Total words: 2,850
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst