Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Mishler results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 5,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,569 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,270 of 6,215 authors). This Jim Mishler is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Jim Mishler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
48%Jim Mishler (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,569
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos