Publication summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 9,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RealClearPolitics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 4,855 hits . Analysis detected 43,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,938 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (135 of 386 publications). This RealClearPolitics is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 36,938
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles36.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 13.1% 13.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Publication 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst