Publication summary
0%9 analyzed articles/videos9,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RealClearPolitics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 4,855 hits. Analysis detected 43,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,938 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (135 of 386 publications). This RealClearPolitics is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
RealClearPolitics
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
66%RealClearPolitics (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles36.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 13.1%13.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Publication 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate