Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J. Peder Zane results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 1,073 hits. Analysis detected 6,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,639 of 6,382 authors). This J. Peder Zane is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
J. Peder Zane
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
75%J. Peder Zane (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,504
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.1%17.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 11.2%11.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 23.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos