Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Draeger results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 689 hits . Analysis detected 4,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,542 of 6,408 authors). This Jonathan Draeger is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Jonathan Draeger
Author details
Total words: 4,036
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.1% 17.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Middle Ground: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst