Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Hains results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,748 hits . Analysis detected 21,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,907 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,465 of 6,244 authors). This Tim Hains is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Tim Hains
Author details
Total words: 18,907
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst