Speaker summary
50% 84 analyzed articles/videos 4,785.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Graham results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 445.28 hits . Analysis detected 4,268.553 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,785.333 analyzed words across 84 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,517 of 26,549 speakers). This Lindsey Graham is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. Lindsey Graham
Speaker details
Total words: 4,785.333
Content count: 84
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score84 analyzed videos4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 65% 7/21/2026, 2:16:24 AM