Author summary
â 66% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Newell results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 9,111 hits . Analysis detected 31,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,704 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 42% (3,873 of 6,628 authors). This Jim Newell is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Jim Newell
Author details
Total words: 27,704
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles27.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.9% 32.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst