Author summary
100%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Dublin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 79.4% saturation with 1,827 hits. Analysis detected 8,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (391 of 6,359 authors). This Tara Dublin is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Tara Dublin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Tara Dublin (selected)10%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 79.4%79.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 38.5%38.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 31.0%31.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 25.2%25.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.6%12.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.1%9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.6%25.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Author 79.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 38.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 31.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 25.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 12.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos