Author summary
80%4 analyzed articles/videos1,279 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alyssa Guzman results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,433 hits. Analysis detected 11,438 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,582 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,616 of 6,135 authors). This Alyssa Guzman is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Alyssa Guzman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%Alyssa Guzman (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,582
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.0%15.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate