CNBC54%

Epstein victims blast Trump attorney general nominee Todd Blanche after meeting 62%

By Dan Mangan73%

7/17/2026, 9:25:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 1,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 954 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,505 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the article peer group.

Victims of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein blasted Todd Blanche after meeting with the acting attorney general at the Department of Justice , a sit-down Sen. 
Thom Tillis urged Blanche to have as he seeks Senate confirmation as the permanent U.S. attorney general . 
Those victims called Blanche condescending and evasive, saying he seemed motivated to talk to them face-to-face Thursday afternoon solely to get his nomination by President Donald Trump advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee . 
"After meeting with Todd Blanche, I feel even more confident in urging senators to vote against his confirmation as the United States' Attorney General," Annie Farmer , one of those victims, said in a statement Thursday night. 
"I found him abrasive, condescending, and intentionally noncommittal to survivors  a marked contrast to his public testimony during his confirmation hearing," Farmer said. 
"While quick to point to the failures of previous administrations, he refused to take accountability for mistakes made under his own leadership." 
But Tillis , a North Carolina Republican, said that he appreciated Blanche's participation, potentially clearing the way for Tillis to vote for his nomination. 
Tillis earlier Thursday had warned that he was not willing to vote to advance the nomination to the full Senate until Blanche met with Epstein victims. 
"I expect that meeting to occur before I'm willing to vote out of the committee," Tillis said Thursday morning. 
If Tillis or another one of the 11 Republicans on the Judiciary Committee votes against Blanche, it could kill his chance of being confirmed, because all 10 Democrats on the panel are expected to vote against him. 
The death of Sen. 
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina last weekend left a Republican vacancy on the committee. 
Blanche could continue serving as acting AG if the Senate does not confirm him. 
The DOJ said Friday morning that Blanche had a "productive, initial discussion" with the small group of victims. 
But Blanche told reporters after the meeting, "It wasn't all cordial." 
"Because there's something that they want that I don't think I can give them, which is some form of justice," Blanche said, according to The Associated Press. 
"And I want to be able to give justice in the form of prosecutions, and maybe we can do a prosecution at some point." 
"I don't know," he added. 
Some victims have criticized Blanche and the DOJ for a botched release of documents about Epstein, which included personally identifying information about survivors, as well as for refusing to meet with them previously. 
Blanche was nominated as attorney general after Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi i n April over her handling of the Epstein files. 
Another Epstein survivor, Liz Stein, in an interview with MS NOW's "The Weeknight," called the meeting with Blanche "demoralizing." 
"It had absolutely nothing to do with us, and it had everything to do with Blanche checking a box so that he can get a promotion," Stein said. 
Dani Bensky, who testified earlier Thursday against Blanche's nomination to the Judiciary Committee, in a statement said, "Unfortunately, Todd Blanche treated the meeting as a mere 'check-the-box' exercise intended to secure votes for his confirmation." 
"He danced around his wording, repeatedly interrupted us and could not commit to anything that would demonstrate good faith or begin to restore trust," Bensky said. 
Bensky criticized Blanche for not adequately accounting for why the DOJ "exposed victims' identifying information and images" in its initial releases of Epstein files. 
"And he offered no credible plan to investigate and pursue accountability beyond Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ," Epstein's convicted accomplice, she said. 
"I hope Senator Tillis will recognize that this meeting was insufficient," Bensky said. 
"Todd Blanche is not qualified to serve as attorney general." 
Amanda Roberts, the sister-in-law of the late Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre , told CNN in an interview that "it felt like he only had it because his hand was forced." 
But Tillis, in a post on X after the meeting, wrote, "I commend Todd Blanche for doing what all his predecessors over the last two decades never did: meet with the victims of ... 
Epstein's horrific crimes." 
"I appreciate his willingness to directly engage and listen to them," Tillis wrote. 
A DOJ spokesperson, in an email to CNBC on Friday, said: "Acting Attorney General Blanche, senior DOJ officials, FBI special agents, and victim services representatives met with Epstein victims [Thursday] and had a productive, initial discussion." 
"Acting AG Blanche answered questions and walked through what is needed for investigations to proceed," the statement said. 
"While some victims said that they had not reached out to the FBI under this administration, he encouraged victims to meet with FBI investigators as the next step, and attendees spoke with agents after the meeting about scheduling interviews," the spokesperson said. 
"The Justice Department is determined to bring justice for all victims of human trafficking and sex crimes." 
It is unclear whether Tillis will vote to advance Blanche's nomination out of the Judiciary Committee. 
Both he and Sen. 
John Cornyn of Texas, a fellow Republican on the panel, have also separately raised concerns about the creation of the DOJ's $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization" fund under Blanche. 
That fund, which would have compensated purported victims of prosecutorial overreach by the DOJ, was set up as part of the controversial settlement of a lawsuit by Trump against the Internal Revenue Service over the illegal leak of his tax records by an IRS contractor. 
Backlash from Republican senators and others led to Blanche telling a House subcommittee in June that the fund was dead. 
However, Tillis, Cornyn and other critics of the fund have raised concerns that the Trump administration could resurrect it. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.4%Dan Mangan: 5.1%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias15.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Dan Mangan: 3.1%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Dan Mangan: 9.7%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Dan Mangan: 1.1%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Dan Mangan: 2.3%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias6.8%This article: 5.9%Dan Mangan: 2.6%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias5.9%This article: 37.4%Dan Mangan: 14.5%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias37.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Dan Mangan: 6.3%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error5.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Dan Mangan: 0.9%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Dan Mangan: 4.1%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Dan Mangan: 1.9%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.8%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%Dan Mangan: 1.9%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 6.6%Dan Mangan: 3.2%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma6.6%This article: 2.0%Dan Mangan: 1.3%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.2%Dan Mangan: 5.1%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization7.2%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.8%Dan Mangan: 3.1%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion2.8%This article: 2.8%Dan Mangan: 0.9%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 4.5%Dan Mangan: 1.5%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 1.5%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.5%Dan Mangan: 0.8%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.1%Dan Mangan: 4.4%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal13.1%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.5%Dan Mangan: 4.2%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.4%Dan Mangan: 2.5%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote7.4%This article: 5.9%Dan Mangan: 2.3%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.9%This article: 2.8%Dan Mangan: 2.5%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice2.8%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Mangan: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Dan Mangan: 1.5%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

954 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers70%attributed speech287writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageThom Tillis • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Farmer • 37 words • 100.0% coverageAnnie Farmer • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Farmer • 22 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 24 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 11 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLiz Stein • 19 words • 100.0% coverageLiz Stein • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Roberts • 30 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 34 words • 100.0% coverageThom Tillis • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Amanda Roberts

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words4.5% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Amanda Roberts: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Amanda Roberts: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.