Keyword summary
85% 19 analyzed articles/videos 4,939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thom Tillis results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 6,750 hits . Analysis detected 50,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,802 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (25,254 of 34,832 keywords). This Thom Tillis is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Thom Tillis
Keyword details
Total words: 45,802
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score19 analyzed articles45.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst