KOB.com37%

Blanche meets with Epstein accusers after demand from Republican senator crucial to confirmation 47%

By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER47% JOEY CAPPELLETTI The Associated Press0%

7/16/2026, 5:41:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 1,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 834 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.6% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,672 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met Thursday with accusers of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein following the demand by a Republican senator whose support is crucial to advancing his nomination to lead the Justice Department. 
Blanche spent about an hour at Justice Department headquarters in Washington with the group of Epstein accusers, who have criticized the Trump administration’s handling of the disgraced financier's investigation and a trove of files related to his sex trafficking case. 
After the meeting, Blanche told reporters that he encouraged the accusers to come to the FBI with any information that could help investigators build cases against additional figures tied to Epstein. 
But Blanche acknowledged he couldn’t assure them additional prosecutions could be brought. 
The Justice Department has repeatedly said it will investigate further if new information surfaces, but the government doesn’t currently have evidence to support prosecutions against others in Epstein's orbit. 
“It wasn’t all cordial,” Blanche said of Thursday’s meeting. 
“Because there’s something that they want that I don’t think I can give them, which is some form of justice. 
And I want to be able to give justice in the form of prosecutions, and maybe we can do a prosecution at some point,” Blanche said. 
But Blanche added, “I don’t know.” 
One accuser is disappointed in Blanche meeting 
One accuser, Dani Bensky, expressed frustration after the meeting, saying Blanche appeared to treat it as “a mere ‘check-the-box’ exercise intended to secure votes for his confirmation.” 
“He danced around his wording, repeatedly interrupted us and could not commit to anything that would demonstrate good faith or begin to restore trust,” she said in an emailed statement. 
She said Blanche offered “no credible plan to investigate and pursue accountability” beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. 
Earlier Thursday, Bensky told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee that women harmed by Epstein repeatedly asked to meet with Blanche “through multiple channels and he never responded.” 
“We deserve to be heard directly, not dismissed and ignored,” Bensky said. 
Blanche has pushed back on suggestions that the Justice Department has been dismissive of the Epstein's accusers, saying officials have spoken with more than 30 representatives of the women over the course of their sweeping review of the files. 
“The Department of Justice will always meet with victims or their representatives, and if those victims or their representatives have evidence that anybody committed a crime  whether it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein or anybody else  we will of course move forward and investigate and prosecute,” Blanche told reporters. 
Blanche needs key Republican support to get confirmed 
The meeting came hours after Republican Sen. 
Thom Tillis said it needed to happen before Blanche could earn his vote. 
Without Tillis’ support, Blanche’s nomination won’t make it through the Senate Judiciary Committee, which questioned Blanche for hours Wednesday about the Epstein files as well as the creation of a fund to compensate President Donald Trump’s allies, a tax immunity deal for the president and a slew of other issues. 
Another Republican, Sen. 
John Cornyn, has also expressed concern over the fund and has said he remains undecided about his vote. 
Tillis indicated during Blanche’s confirmation hearing Wednesday that he was leaning toward backing Blanche, who has been leading the department in an acting capacity since April. 
But after lawmakers heard Bensky's testimony, Tillis said he expected a meeting between victims and Blanche to occur before he’s “willing to vote out of this committee.” 
Tillis later Thursday commended Blanche for holding the meeting, writing in a social media post, “I appreciate his willingness to directly engage and listen to them.” 
After missteps by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi that enraged Trump's base, Blanche as deputy attorney general oversaw a massive review and the release of millions of files related to the investigation into Epstein. 
The case has captivated internet sleuths and conspiracy theorists for years, in part because of Epstein's connections to other powerful individuals. 
Blanche has also defended the department's staggered release of the Epstein files, a process beset by problems, including redaction errors that left exposed nude photos showing the faces of potential victims. 
Blanche said during his confirmation hearing Wednesday that he takes responsibility for mistakes that were made, but noted that department lawyers were given a “herculean task” to quickly review millions of files for release. 
Blanche said department lawyers took pains to protect the women involved, and quickly fixed any errors that were found. 
“I am sorry that in about 1% of the documents mistakes were made,” Blanche said Wednesday. 
“But what I will say on top of that is we put tons of resources to rectifying those mistakes immediately, including pulling down documents within minutes of being informed that there were mistakes.” 
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. 
All rights reserved. 
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.1%KOB.com: 1.2%Confirmation Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.5%KOB.com: 1.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.6%KOB.com: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.9%KOB.com: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.6%KOB.com: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.6%KOB.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 13.5%Alanna Durkin Richer: 11.1%KOB.com: 9.7%Framing Effect13.5%This article: 1.9%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%KOB.com: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.9%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%KOB.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.5%KOB.com: 4.1%Optimism Bias9.4%This article: 3.6%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%KOB.com: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 14.6%Alanna Durkin Richer: 12.7%KOB.com: 7.5%Negativity Bias14.6%This article: 15.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 4.6%KOB.com: 3.4%Self-Serving Bias15.0%This article: 4.1%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.5%KOB.com: 2.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.1%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%KOB.com: 5.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.6%KOB.com: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.0%KOB.com: 0.7%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%KOB.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.0%KOB.com: 1.6%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%KOB.com: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.3%KOB.com: 0.7%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%KOB.com: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.0%KOB.com: 1.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.5%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.8%KOB.com: 0.6%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%KOB.com: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.9%KOB.com: 2.2%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%KOB.com: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%KOB.com: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.4%Alanna Durkin Richer: 4.9%KOB.com: 7.0%Appeal to Emotion5.4%This article: 6.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.7%KOB.com: 1.4%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 17.7%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.4%KOB.com: 4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.7%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%KOB.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.5%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%KOB.com: 1.6%Burden of Proof3.5%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%KOB.com: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.0%KOB.com: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%KOB.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.2%KOB.com: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%KOB.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%KOB.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%KOB.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.9%KOB.com: 0.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.2%KOB.com: 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 6.4%KOB.com: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.6%KOB.com: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.1%KOB.com: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%KOB.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%KOB.com: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

834 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers68%attributed speech266writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 39 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 18 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 34 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 33 words • 0.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dani Bensky

100%flagged-word coverage
127 attributed words22% of attributed speech76% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.