Speaker summary
65% 14 analyzed articles/videos 1,519.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dani Bensky results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 521.307 hits . Analysis detected 3,565.214 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,519.333 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (26,234 of 26,866 speakers). This Dani Bensky is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Dani Bensky
Speaker details
Total words: 1,519.333
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 4.8% BS Score14 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst