Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These The Manila Times results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 398 hits . Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 386 publications). This The Manila Times is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst