Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These JOEY CAPPELLETTI The Associated Press results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 3,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This JOEY CAPPELLETTI The Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
JOEY CAPPELLETTI The Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%JOEY CAPPELLETTI The Associated Press (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate