Blanche meets with Epstein accusers 57%

By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER46% JOEY CAPPELLETTI The Associated Press0%

7/18/2026, 8:02:00 AM

Topics: Politics, Law, Crime
Keywords: Imported, National

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 698 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (8,955 of 20,498 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON -- Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met Thursday with accusers of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein following the demand by a Republican senator whose support is crucial to advancing his nomination to lead the Justice Department. 
Blanche spent about an hour at Justice Department headquarters in Washington with the group of Epstein accusers, who have criticized the Trump administration's handling of the disgraced financier's investigation and a trove of files related to his sex trafficking case. 
After the meeting, Blanche told reporters that he encouraged the accusers to come to the FBI with any information that could help investigators build cases against additional figures tied to Epstein. 
But Blanche acknowledged that he couldn't assure them additional prosecutions could be brought. 
The Justice Department has repeatedly said it will investigate further if new information surfaces, but the government doesn't currently have evidence to support prosecutions against others in Epstein's orbit. 
"It wasn't all cordial," Blanche said of Thursday's meeting. 
"Because there's something that they want that I don't think I can give them, which is some form of justice. 
And I want to be able to give justice in the form of prosecutions, and maybe we can do a prosecution at some point," Blanche said. 
But Blanche added, "I don't know." 
The political firestorm over Epstein has been a persistent headache for the Trump administration, which released millions of investigative documents over the last year in response to right-wing clamoring for answers about the disgraced financier's crimes and connections to high-profile people. 
One accuser, Dani Bensky, expressed frustration after the meeting, saying Blanche appeared to treat it as "a mere 'check-the-box' exercise intended to secure votes for his confirmation." 
"He danced around his wording, repeatedly interrupted us and could not commit to anything that would demonstrate good faith or begin to restore trust," she said in an emailed statement. 
She said Blanche offered "no credible plan to investigate and pursue accountability" beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. 
Earlier Thursday, Bensky told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee that women harmed by Epstein repeatedly asked to meet with Blanche "through multiple channels and he never responded." 
"We deserve to be heard directly, not dismissed and ignored," Bensky said. 
Blanche has pushed back on suggestions that the Justice Department has been dismissive of Epstein's accusers, saying officials have spoken with more than 30 representatives of the women over the course of their sweeping review of the files. 
"The Department of Justice will always meet with victims or their representatives, and if those victims or their representatives have evidence that anybody committed a crime -- whether it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein or anybody else -- we will of course move forward and investigate and prosecute," Blanche told reporters. 
The meeting came hours after Republican Sen. 
Thom Tillis said it needed to happen before Blanche could earn his vote. 
Without Tillis' support, Blanche's nomination won't make it through the Senate Judiciary Committee, which questioned Blanche for hours Wednesday about the Epstein files as well as the creation of a fund to compensate President Donald Trump's allies, a tax immunity deal for the president and a slew of other issues. 
Another Republican, Sen. 
John Cornyn, has also expressed concern over the fund and has said he remains undecided about his vote. 
Tillis indicated during Blanche's confirmation hearing Wednesday that he was leaning toward backing Blanche, who has been leading the department in an acting capacity since April. 
But after lawmakers heard Bensky's testimony, Tillis said he expected a meeting between victims and Blanche to occur before he's "willing to vote out of this committee." 
Tillis later Thursday commended Blanche for holding the meeting, writing in a social media post, "I appreciate his willingness to directly engage and listen to them." 
After missteps by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi that enraged Trump's base, Blanche as deputy attorney general oversaw a huge review and the release of millions of files related to the investigation into Epstein. 
The case has captivated internet sleuths and conspiracy theorists for years, in part because of Epstein's connections to other powerful individuals. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.5%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.4%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 10.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic10.2%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Alanna Durkin Richer: 11.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 8.7%Framing Effect17.8%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.5%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 3.3%Optimism Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 12.7%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 9.0%Negativity Bias26.2%This article: 9.3%Alanna Durkin Richer: 4.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 5.0%Self-Serving Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.5%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 5.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.3%Halo Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.8%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.4%Ad Hominem3.9%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.7%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 3.1%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.3%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 3.6%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.4%Alanna Durkin Richer: 4.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion6.4%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.7%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.9%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.4%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.2%Composition/Division3.0%This article: 8.3%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.9%Anecdotal8.3%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.4%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.1%Special Pleading7.4%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 1.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.9%Unattributed Quote1.0%This article: 3.9%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 6.4%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 2.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alanna Durkin Richer: 0.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

698 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers48%attributed speech361writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDani Bensky • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDani Bensky • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageThom Tillis • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dani Bensky

100%flagged-word coverage
127 attributed words38% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+21.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dani Bensky: 21.3%21.3%Unattributed Quote-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Dani Bensky: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.