Keyword summary
51% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Imported results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 2,302 hits . Analysis detected 12,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,854 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (24,753 of 34,832 keywords). This Imported is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Imported
Keyword details
Total words: 12,854
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst