Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hannah Wyman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,263 authors). This Hannah Wyman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hannah Wyman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Hannah Wyman (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,242
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.7%2.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos