Publication summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KOB.com results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 361 hits . Analysis detected 2,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,706 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 69% (130 of 410 publications). This KOB.com is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,706
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst