Author summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Fjeld results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 861 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,488 of 6,359 authors). This Jonathan Fjeld is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Jonathan Fjeld
Author details
Total words: 1,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 2.7% 2.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst